Example:
The 1, 2, 3, and 4 correspond to multiple choice selections. On the Regents Exams these are the same: 1, 2, 3, 4. On the 3-8 assessments, these correspond to letters (i.e., 1 = A, 2 = B, etc.).
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
| MC-001 | 25% | 50% | 0% | 25% |
| MC-002 | 50% | 0% | 0% | 50% |
If 20 students answered MC-001 incorrectly, then we know 5 answered 1, 10 answered 2, 0 answerd 3 (the right answer by process of elimination), and 5 answered 4.
Remember that we're working with percentages here, so it's important to know the total number of incorrect responses for each item because perhaps only 4 students responded incorrectly for MC-002. The mistakes of 4 students may be lend some insight into those students, but out of a class of 25 students, if 20 answered an item incorrectly the insight from these errors may lead to instructional and curricular investigation. We cannot identify what the correct response (from this view of the data) was for MC-002 because two responses had 0% so there is no process of elimination.
Facilitation Questions
What are some trends you noticed when investigating the errors students made? Were there patterns or trends in the types of questions? Were there patterns or trends in the content of the questions?
Why is it important to know the total number of incorrect responses for each item before looking too deeply at this view of the data?
What additional student performance data do you have that supports or contradicts what you found here?
What did you learn about how you teach or assess students from this analysis of the data?
Page Information
|
Wiki Information |
Recent PBwiki Blog Posts |